Hello I would like to start a discussion about the very large prehistoric Hallettestoneion Seazoria Dragons. I realize that Dragons are supposed to be a product of mythology. That what I used to think anyway. Here is a nifty little story about how I found the prehistoric sea dragons. I work in excavation and we use really large track hoes to open up the ground 10 hours per day as we develop raw property into commercial developments. We excavate infrastructures.
All that excavation background is what led to the discovery of the true prehistoric dragons now known as the Hallettestoneion Seazoria Dragons. Lets get right at some of the main points and features of the Seazoria Dragons. Size, wow 130 feet to beyond 300 feet. 100 meters. The skulls are about 3 meters on avera and the teeth are about, well less than a meter. We measure everything in feet and inches and I am trying to convert the measurements to metrics.
The Seazoria Dragons discovery was made in November of 2,003. It has been a long hard process trying to figure out a basic overview and understanding of the Seazorias. Since the dragons have never been found before their are absolutely no experts on the subject. The Dragon biological era pre dates the Dinosaur era. And the vertebra land dinosaurs is all that's been recovered by science so farr. About 5,000 dinosaurs have been found in the last 150 years since discovery in the 1,840s. The large scale marine life (sea dinosaurs) have not been recovered yet. most paleontologists think there was only large land dinosaurs and no large sea dinosaurs.
The point about the scientific community is that the science of paleontology is based on a vertebra land dinosaur template with an age range of 65 to 220 million years. Any new large advanced discovery is compared to the land dinosaur platform. Dragons are not dinosaurs. Dinosaurs come from the land and are walkers. Dragons come from the sea and are swimmers. The difference between dinosaurs and sea dragons is like comparing the body of an elephant to a 90 ft 30m Blue whale.
After first finding the Seazoria Dragons i was hesitant to say anything to anyone because the remains had been reduced to dirt and stone. /but without question the specialized configurations of individual stones we in the exact configuration layout of very large, highly evolved prehistoric marine reptiles. Down to the very finest details. As an example the skulls have an equal right and left halves. skulls are always cut off at the back and grow forward to the nose section. very similar to dinosaur skulls and snake heads.
Skulls are one of the keys and total proof behind the discovery of the prehistoric Hallettestoneion Seazoria Dragons. The Skull have a full and complete set of teeth. all rights lefts tops and bottom teeth. and all full size teeth have smaller identical replacement teeth. Seazoria teeth are arranged in a duck billed configuration extending out to the sides of the skull and out in front of the skull. Seazoria teeth are white Seazoria teeth are in distinctive right or left handed configurations only. Seazoria teeth are basically five sided triangular wedges. with an attachment base growing to a specialized tip. The Zoria repeat wedge features a blunt leading edge for piercing and a double cutter slicing trailng edge. Seazoria teeth are always crowned on the outside face of wedge. inside face of wedge is flat slightly concave at tip..
Sorry forum readers but I am out of time. and must be to work in an hour. However this was fun blogging my favorite topic Seazoria dragons. Since the time of the discovery back in 2,003 I have accumulated in excess of 14,000 hours of Seazoria specific development time. Field research, lab time, comparison, discussion and writing on the on the development of the science of Hallettestoneology that un locked to understand the Seazoria Dragons Discovery.
I would like to post photos of the skull matrix excavation of Hillfieldion Seazoria a prehistoric Hallettestoneion Seazoria Dragons. I am working on a slide show with 288 photos of skull and teeth taken during the skull matrix teeth excavation of the right hand side of the skull.
I am very much interested in listening to your comments after reading this tread so please say something. good bad or other it would be very interesting to hear comments in a dragon specific forum after reading a post written by someone who works around and excavates prehistoric dragon.

The Seazoria Dragons have a website and the address is http://www.seazoria.com you can view photos. And there is a blog where I have written about the Seazoria Dragons discovery. Last weekend we put in a new tab called the "Zoria Repeat" there is only 3 photos on the page so far. on the bottom picture if you click on it it will redirect you to my online photo album with more than 250 images you can see excavation photos and field research developed for the Hallettestoneion Research Project. I think that 10 of the images with yellow writing on the front are small videos 1 to 2 minutes long . Film was shot at the graveyard during a Seazoria Dragon Excavation.

Remember it is really important that you make a comment, Please your feedback is most important to this project.
Thanks very much for your participation.
-Seazoria Dragons_

I looked at your website and all the photos of the teeth and excavation and you have me pretty well convinced... at first i thought it was just a bunch of stones then i realized that there were too many similarities between each stone and they had similar structures which looked a lot like teeth so that is what convinced me.... i just had some difficulty comprehending the enormous scope that the creatures head would have had to be to have teeth that size and in that quantity....

Amazing... simply amazing

_________________
May you never feel a Forgotten Dragon's Ire I miei Amici.

*everyone is saying oh no vampirehunter is posting.*


So you have been at this for what two or three years, right? And all you have is one "skull" and a number of rather large "teeth". Where is the rest of the body. The video says you have it there but no pictures of the backbone or anything else. Truly, showing the many interlocking vertebra of this creature will show a lot more evidence towards a biological creature than the apparent skull and teeth. Just dig out one of the forelimbs, they ought to be easy to find. And again are less likely to look like a misidentified rock.

So on this skull, I can see no spot for eyes or a nostril hole. It also looks rather thin and short to support the rather large teeth you are showing there. Also I see any sign of a jaw of any sort, either the jaw itself or a spot on that skull to connect it. I may have only seen a few prehistoric skulls face to face, but I see no skull in that object.

_________________
The victories from those skilled in warfare are not considered of great wisdom or courage, because their victories have no miscalculations
- SUN-TZU

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, that's all I'll say.

_________________
Formerly DragonRider. Almost teenage me could have been more imaginative with names.

What? This seems very confusing. Im amazed at the amount of work thats been done, and all the information and all, but I am still sceptic, I dont know much about this, and I dont really have any confidence to read any more. Im honestly going to have to go strongly with everything vamp says... and untill there is a decent reply to vamps excellent post, I refuse to make any more attempts to understand...

Hello fellow members. I have returned to update the topic of Hallettestoneion Seazoria Dragons. First of all, thank you for allowing me to post on this most significant and historical discovery here in Dragonix.

At this time I can report to you that prehistoric Seazoria biology has been confirmed through laboratory testing at the Institute for Earth and Environmental Sciences in Vancouver Canada by PhD paleontologist / micro biologist Sir Gary Stonely.

The official confirmation of prehistoric Seazoria biology was made in early September. New dating results have place the Seazoria biology at 484 million years old. Some of the testing results have already been posted to my facebook page at http://www.facebook.com
http://www.facebook.com/pages/HALLETTES ... 716?ref=ts

The PhD paleontologist who tested the Seazoria is a specialist in the identification of prehistoric biology. All Seazoria specimens tested in the laboratory were proven to be of biological origin.

The Institute and the paleontology consulting firm that contracted the testing have both requested that more Seazoria specimens be sent to further the scientific understanding of the most significant and historical prehistoric biological discovery.

The information provided to the respected member of the Dragonix site has been provided by the discover who is the leader of the Hallettestoneion Seazoria Dragons discovery research project.

Thank you for taking the time to read this post.
http://www.seazoria.com
Best wishes to all
Respectfully yours,
Mike Hallett -seazoria-
Discoverer Hallettestoneion Seazoria Dragons.

First I would like to say, Congratulations and very convincing.

Second, did you find anything other than teeth, skull and back spikes??? This information would be very helpful by letting us actually grasp whether or not it's a dragon or not..... It's not easy to tell by just looking at a skull and a bunch of drawn pictures on what you think it might look like..... Not that I'm questioning you on it but I personally think it's a little too soon to call it a dragon without an actual body (unless you found one)... for what we know (which isn't much) it might not even be a dragon but an ancient octopus with a reptile like head.... I'm not saying it is but I am saying that it's a little too soon to call it a 100% dragon or dragon relative (should there be any/ Biggest possibility)… all I’m trying to say is that, “wouldn’t it be more wise to find more proof like a body to support your theory that it is a dragon be for claiming something that could possibly be wrong?”(not that I’m saying that your wrong but I am saying that it’s still a possibility) If you did find the "dragon's" body could you plz send us a pic of it so we could grasp the idea a lot better.

_________________
Drakel: Guard the dragon, Hunt the slayers, Master the skills to save the idea.

My Website: http://drageloc.forumotion.com/
Where I'm At: http://www.roleplayerguild.com/users/126
My Skype: Drakel001
My Facebook: Drakel Pyrohell

Sigh......

1. Logically a creature this size would not need large "sharp teeth". Most things that it would have eaten would have hard shells or exoskeletons around the body. So it would need crushing and grinding teeth for that, much like some bottom feeding sharks. But what is more likely is a filtering system like baleen whales.

2. I can not find this "Sir" Gary Stonely anywhere. Neither under a professional level, or a knighted list. I have only found one maybe use of the name as an assistant to a real doctor.

3. I am sorry, they still look like rocks to me. I see no biology connected with the original shape of the rocks.

4. I know you have been told these things many times. But the number one thing a researcher can do is look at their work and find what is wrong with it. All I see are "buzz words" and pictures of shaped rocks. I have yet to see anything that I could not have found with a couple of hours searching in a rocky area.

_________________
The victories from those skilled in warfare are not considered of great wisdom or courage, because their victories have no miscalculations
- SUN-TZU

Thank you for engaging me on this top Grand Master Dragon. I do appreciate the delicacy in which you have stated your questions. Have I found more than just skulls, teeth and body spike's. The answer is yes. Skulls still attached to their bodies. You questions remind me of a phone call that I received yesterday from a very close friend. He suggested that I needed to make a clear clarification as to exactly the type biology that has been discovered. More importantly my friend advised that I needed to make a post that distinguished the 484 million year old prehistoric sea dragons that I had discovered. His main point was that when he was attempting to convey my discovery to his friends located 2000 miles away from the Seazoria graveyards. That he had ran into problems because all of his friends immediately conjured up mid evil images of flying fire breathing dragons and knights in shining armor slaying the mighty dragon to save the princess. By the way the was very difficult to write because I have never delved into subject of mythical dragons before. In fact I dont have any knowledge of mythical dragons.

Drakel There is so much ro say and post. I began writing your reply last night but was interrupted by the Canadian scientists. My attention was diverted as we discussed the new shipment of Seazoria remains had just arrived in Canada. There are many advancement to the Seazoria discovery that are taking place behind the scenes with the scientists. A recent communication stated that all Seazoria specimens tested in the laboratory at the Institute for Earth and Environmental science had been proven to be of biological origins. When I get a spare moment I would like to copy excerpts from communications between myself and the laboratory paleontologists.

Thanks for posing the questions. As to what I have discovered. I have found a prehistoric marine ecosystem that has been frozen in time and buried for 467 to 484 million years. I say the word prehistoric sea dragon based on my 20,000 hours of research. Prehistoric Sea Dragons is the only set of words in the English language that accurately describes What I have found.

Time is somewhat short as I need to deal with the documentary filmmaker that filmed a documentary on the Seazoria discovery last summer and now the Hollywood movie production company MGM is reviewing our project Called "The Discovery of the Hallettestoneion Seazoria Dragons. I also need to update a local television company that featured the Seazoria Dragons discovery several years ago. In addition to working out the negotiation details of the next Seazoria Dragon Excavation. The Crawfordion Seazoria excavation project.

The new excavation will provide the best information to date on developing extensive biological information on the physical remains in total. Crawfordian Seazoria is an intact Hallettestoneion Seazoria Dragon.

This post is going to be interrupted as I have just received a phone call and someone want to view my collection of Seazoria Dragon remains and field research documents in about 10 minutes from now.

Please bere with me and give me some time to upload more photos.
Thank you -seazoria-

I am going to release certain excerpts from conversations between myself and the PhD paleontologist testing Seazoria biology in the laboratory.

Excerpt #1
I can conclude at this point, that the smaller of the spikes is of a biological origin and dated to be 480 myo +/- 20,000 years. This is known as the Lower/Early Series in the Ordovician Period.

Dating on the larger spike is inconclusive as Keith has instructed me that permission is granted to probe deeper into the specimens core for a more accurate results. I was still able to get a reading from the scrapings I took and got a 400 myo +/- 12,000 years. This is known as the Silurian/Devonian Boundary Period.

Excerpt #2
However, I spent time after hours with the specimen Keith supplied me with and came up with a different relative age from before. To recap, the scrapings I tested before are dated to 400 myo +/- 12,000 years (Silurian/Devonian Boundary) and is indeed of biological origin. Now the 12 gram sample results from late last nights endeavor gave me 484 myo +/- 12,000 years. This outcome puts a time stamp to the Lower/Early Series in the Ordovician Period. The results are very comparable to the first smaller of the spikes I tested.

Studying the internal cores in the next few weeks will prove promising. I have arranged for two of last years university grad students to assist me with internal core phase. I will be able to acquire accurate aging of the elements and analyze the mineral compositions more thoroughly with additional assistance.

Excerpt #3
I was persuaded to work the weekend to acquire test results on the large spike I recently picked up in Brooks, AB. The results are all you need to lure the scientific community into the understanding. At this point, I can not test origins of species, rather, testing for biological make up and compositions is all we can do at this point. There is no doubt, that this larger of spikes is of a biological origin. It differs slightly from the previous samples and tests I have conducted.

I have taken four photographs and made a collage to make one photo. The first of photos (top left) is of me holding the center core of the large spike. The core contains a rich iron band and trace carbons surrounded by rich calcium. The second photo (top right) shows U.Cambrian/Ordovician micro-fossils which are discovered all over the Ordovician Period. The third photo (bottom left) shows the fist cross section cut of the large spike and displays calcium nodules withing the matrix. The fourth photo (bottom right) is of a thin sectioned slice of the core containing the iron bands, calcium and trace carbons.

-seazoria- these are excerpts that I am sharing with you. Maybe this information might provide a little better insight into for the members here at Dragonix the latest developments on a scientific level. I have noticed a new comment and briefly looked through it, but dont have time tonight to respond directly to the comment.
Thanks -seazoria-