Accounts that are not used are not something Microsoft would call a "Critical Security issue". Most of the time, it's a user who plan to post and create an account but found themselves busy elsewhere or that their opportunity to reply something is gone (either someone posted something similar or the topic drifted to something else).
Some of these lurkers probably do read the board but may not feel like participating in forum discussions at this moment. One day, perhaps, some of them will post something, some may not... However, locking down accounts when the board itself is less than 2 months old do not seems to convey a very welcoming message. Also, some may even prefer to just read at first before participating, and if they prefer to do that then I cannot really force anyone to post before they feel like doing so.
I may delete unused account in the future if the post count is zero and if there is a reasonable time (think 6 months at the very least) that has elapsed since the last time they have logged in. Alternatively, I could simply make the "zero post" users to not be shown on the memberlist. Either way, I prefer to play on the safe side than to receive emails from people asking why their account has been deleted.
|